In Which We Complain About The Preliminary Depth Chart And Be Melodramatic.
So as you all know, the first cut of the depth chart was released yesterday. In true MCM fashion, I'm going to make a big deal out of it. I guess that implies that I've got problems, but in actuality, it's not that bad outside of a few glaring issues. First off, I'm pretty stoked about the tight end position this year. There's the blockers with Graham and Stevens and then there's the play maker in training with Jared Cook, but the order that they've been placed on the depth chart really grinds my gears. After all the hype that Cook has garnered this offseason and the reputation that Graham has gained for being the best blocking tight end in football, I really question how Craig Stevens is now sitting in the starters role. Maybe he's made some massive amount of progress this year, that's the only thing I can think of at this point. I only pray this doesn't turn into a Fisher-esque irrational loyalty trend in Munchak.
Second, I'm still questioning Justin Gage's roster spot. Seriously, what does he bring to the table right now that can't be replaced with any old waiver wire pickup? Words kind of fail me on that one. Just give the roster spot to Lavelle Hawkins, I don't even really care if he's an improvement, I'm just sick of watching number twelve drop passes. I'd much rather watch number eighty-seven do it. I also saw something I liked; Damian Williams as the backup to Kenny Britt. Now I'm not shocked here, but to think that Damian might get a shot to get significant playing time this year makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.
Moving on to the defense: I don't like Frank Walker as the backup anything on this team. I've got nothing against him personally, but if you all thought Finnegan was a mess last year when it came to dumb fifteen yard penalties last year, just wait until Walker gets out there. His pass interference calls became the stuff of legend here in Baltimore while he was with the Ravens. I can tell you right now that we want none of that here in 2011. Also, a quick look at the DT position has me scratching my head. Shaun Smith as one starter is cool, I saw that coming as soon as he was signed, but Sen'Derrick Marks at the other spot? I'm glad he's getting his chance, but I don't really know what he's done to earn it over Jurrell Casey who's come flying out of the gates.
Jason Jones at defensive end should be fun this year. I really hope he Derrick Morgan cause all kinds of problems for offensive tackles this year.
At outside linebacker, Will Witherspoon makes sense right now to me. I think he'll do an adequate job, but I hope that McRath can beat him for the position at the end of camp. If he ends up panning out, the defense will have added a very good player. If he doesn't, it'll soon be time to start thinking about his replacement.
Strong safety is a really fun position to watch this year in terms of camp battles. I'm a little bit surprised that Jordan Babineaux is still behind Chris Hope at this point given that he's younger and has a potentially wider skill set, but he still hasn't had a whole lot of time to show his stuff yet. I get the feeling that he'll be the starter when week one rolls around.
Early on, there hasn't been that much to be melodramatic about I guess, but I really hope Craig Stevens shows me why he should be the starter, and fast, because I'll be about ready to freak out if Jared Cook is buried on the bench again this year.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think we are hiding JC
Until the real season starts.
by datboybevans on Aug 8, 2011 4:24 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
McCarthy or McRath?
Don’t know if that was a goof or not.
he never will wear number 10 - Fernando brazil refering to Locker. Uh...
whoops thanks for the catch
Damn it feels good to be a contributor, Music City Miracles.
"We’re not backing down, we’re not scared of them...them and their 180 million dollar payroll"
- Kevin Gregg
by danielreese05 on Aug 8, 2011 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions
I think you're giving too much credit for "potential"
I love Casey as much as the next guy but he is a rookie 3rd round pick who has only had 1 week of practice. Let’s see him in some actual game action before we anoint him the next Haynesworth. Marks has the size Gray wants as well as some experience so it doesn’t surprise me to see him listed as “starter” but all of the DTs are going to get plenty of playing time.
And, don’t get too fired up about the TE depth chart…all 3 guys are going to play and I expect Cook to be used in that TE/WR hybrid spot, a la Jermichael Finley or Antonio Gates.
And, let’s not throw Munchak under the bus because he has Gage listed as backup for now…remember, Fisher had him as the starter at the beginning of last season. I do expect Gage to be cut by the end of preseason though…but you need WRs to practice with so you can keep Gage for now.
We haven’t even gone through the first round of cuts yet…so let’s not get too worked up over a depth chart that may have been put together by someone other than the actual head coach.
Stevens is TE #1
Simply because he’s part of the base set which is inherently a run formation. (2 WRs, 2 RBs, 1 TE). It really doesn’t mean anything because Tight Ends are so situational. We’ll be seeing plenty of Cook in 3 WR sets and 2 TE sets.
I never understood how being a starter in the NFL means anything because u got different guys in at different packages all that craig Stevens starting to me means is that Cj will run the first play of the game and then on second down jared cook will come in this is a team sport it doesn’t matter who starts but who can contribute that week against that defense I just hope our new coaching staff can make good in game adjustments and have every player ready so if one players style isn’t effective they have another player with different skill sets ready to play instead of beating a dead horse and calling the same type of plays all game long like they was doin last year
by lockemindatrunk on Aug 8, 2011 4:45 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
From the title of the post I thought you were going to
make fun of all the people “overreacting and be melodramatic” about a meaningless depth chart. But then you went and joined right in.
Unofficial MCM QB Rating Hater
Epistemological Police
I hope she does.
and I also hope she grounds him for being such a crappy player.
I'm a brony and proud of it.
You are overreacting...
There’s only one good piece of info that comes out of depth charts released this time of year: Who is playing what position. And that information was already released.
Regarding Cook, don’t pay attention to that. He is not a true TE, but Craig Stevens is. So, he fits better in the over-simplified depth chart on the website.
Why do you say that?
It's all fun and games until someone gets a concussion from a stray flying footbal. *cough* Kerry *cough*
by MikeGriffFan27 on Aug 8, 2011 5:25 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
crazy
cook is a beast you can tell in practice. why does everybody talk about him if he is not good. i never hear stevens its always cook. you guys will eat them words big time
All three TE will be active on gameday
and all three will play in games; no big deal there. I was surprised about Marks though, but you don’t want to give a rookie a position too quickly. Legendary PI penalties sounds like a topic of its own.
MCM's First Best Player Available (or Jake Locker) FanBoy!

by 


































