The HGH Testing Policy: Totally Not Going To Work.
Something that we haven't really touched on that much here at MCM this offseason which is sure to generate some controversy is the league's new HGH testing policy. Whilst browsing through other SBN blogs this evening, I found an interesting piece on Battle Red Blog about how the new testing policy was as likely to, as the author put it, "lessen the use of PEDs in the NFL the way not letting me take a coffee through security lessens future terrorist attacks."
I don't know how totally black and white the entire issue is, but I have to say that I agree. This is just too easy of a system to beat and random testing won't do anything to help that. If it does, the chances of having a significant enough impact through the punishment system are so slim that it seems almost hopeless.
For starters, unlike many other drugs, HGH is detected through a simple blood test. However, it's painfully easy to cheat said blood test as long as the last injection was, at the most, two days before the test. So unless the NFL plans on getting extremely lucky with their big anti-HGH raids, the likelihood that someone will get caught by injecting HGH less than two days before his required blood test seems low. I don't mean to say that no one will ever be caught by a random drug test. There's usually, at most, a few players every year who are busted for illegal use of PED's and are disciplined, but to think that this will eliminate the problem altogether, a goal that should be targeted by the league office, is foolish.
From where I'm standing, this is much more of "it's the thought that counts" addition to the CBA. The NFL will get brownie points for attempting to weed out some of the offenders while the real prevention will come from players with enough common sense to not exercise their legal right to use the substance and realize that there are very real dangers associated with prolonged usage. Like anything, too much or too little of the naturally-produced HGH will result in some seriously nasty side effects. Some of the worst include brain tumors, increased susceptibility to diabetes, and while the link was never officially made, reports that it can lead colon cancer and prostate cancer are definitely out there.
The way I see it, the only way to eliminate the problem is through severe penalties (like, not just a four game suspension) being handed down to even first time offenders. If the league is really as concerned for the long-term health of their players, they'll crack down on HGH and all other PED's hard. As serious and common as the concussion problem is in today's game, the threat of lasting side effects from HGH and other PED's should be taken just as seriously, if not more so. In a perfect world, players would be speaking out against the usage of all PED's to kids who play today to help discourage usage. I'd be lying if I told you that none of my teammates over the years have never given in to the temptation for a quick boost. In high school, the frequency of testing is an absolute joke. I appreciate the trust that the league has given us to not use PED's, but in all honesty, we don't deserve it. I'm not saying the use of steroids is rampant, but there are times where it's painfully obvious (drastically improved 40 time, significant gain in muscle mass over short periods of time, etc.) when some players are using. Although the results are awesome, the risks just aren't worth it. As for players like Gerald McRath and Brian Cushing, judging their actions isn't necessary. In a profession where your body is your meal ticket, some bad decisions are sure to be made. Do I wish that their penalties had been a little bit more severe? Yes, absolutely, but as far as their actions go, they're regrettable, but understandable.
I have my doubts that this policy will do much of anything to help eliminate the use of drugs in the NFL. Ultimately, this has to be a choice that everyone who enters the league will make to not use PED's. The only way to fix the problem is through the conscious decision of all players to set an example and just say no.
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
cool
I wasn’t aware until recently that you currently play the sport. I appreciate the personal info – brings more to the story for me.
Sadly
The roids didn’t really help McGrath at all
It's all fun and games until someone gets a concussion from a stray flying footbal. *cough* Kerry *cough*
by MikeGriffFan27 on Aug 11, 2011 11:42 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
MrGrath is the new Hasselback is the new Ahmed is the new Courtland is the new Thorton is the new Bullock.
Contributor at Music City Miracles. and On The Forecheck.
Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose.
by Aditya T (smashville) on Aug 12, 2011 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions
I see what you did there
Jarrod Parker 2011 Watch: 20 Starts, 9-7, 4.25 ERA, 103.2 IP, 93 Ks, 50 BBs, 1.360 WHIP, 1.86 K/BB, 8.1 Ks/9
by Bryan J. Boltik on Aug 12, 2011 1:09 AM CDT up reply actions
I've always thought it was McGrath
I blame Madden
It's all fun and games until someone gets a concussion from a stray flying footbal. *cough* Kerry *cough*
by MikeGriffFan27 on Aug 12, 2011 8:07 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Speaking of HGH
McRath signed me and a few others guys’ stuff today, even though he wasn’t scheduled too.
Check out my Youtube Channel Icecru2
yeah, i want some views...
Chris Johnson (2008-2011) HighLights
Alterraun Verner Rookie Highlights
Yes, Chris Johnson has broken more tackles than Adrian Peterson in 2009 and in 2010
Who will be the next
Onterrio Smith?
Jarrod Parker 2011 Watch: 20 Starts, 9-7, 4.25 ERA, 103.2 IP, 93 Ks, 50 BBs, 1.360 WHIP, 1.86 K/BB, 8.1 Ks/9
by Bryan J. Boltik on Aug 12, 2011 1:05 AM CDT reply actions
Thinking back on Cushing and his lies...
…is still f’ing hilarious
MCM's First Best Player Available (or Jake Locker) FanBoy!
Over training
pfft!
Check out my Youtube Channel Icecru2
yeah, i want some views...
Chris Johnson (2008-2011) HighLights
Alterraun Verner Rookie Highlights
Yes, Chris Johnson has broken more tackles than Adrian Peterson in 2009 and in 2010
by Ice0ne (CAJ) on Aug 12, 2011 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions
I couldn't find any article on the NFL's new PED testing policy
on HGH, are they only looking at detecting synthetic HGH? Or are they also going to look for HGH releasers in the blood?
It should be both if they are really serious about it. Anyway, you are right. The detection methods are still currently behind on both synthetic HGH and moreso on HGH releasers.
Honestly, i don’t see how this policy will dissuade players on boosting their HGH when it can easily be circumvented.
If they were to go hard on steroids,
They would have to warn a year before the real control begins, otherwise the league would be shut down for lack of clean players to play the game.
"He's an amazing talent. He's probably the most explosive back since Marshall Faulk and Barry Sanders." - Eddie George, about CJ.
by criollo_pcg on Aug 12, 2011 6:06 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
from steroids.info:
While anti-doping crusaders are lauding the introduction of hGH testing in the NFL as a major victory, they are overlooking the fact that the blood test for hGH is largely considered ineffective. Its ineffectiveness is due to the fact that the window for detecting exogenous hGH use with the blood test is extremely short – only a couple of hours.
The hGH blood test has been in existence since the 2004 Athens Olympics and after thousands and thousands of tests, it can claim only one analytical positive for hGH.
Pearl for Life.
The Dual Threat, Official Enforcer/Stat Geek of MCM.
You have to take baby steps with the players.
There are probably a significant amount of players on PEDs, and each one of them has to vote on these kind of things. There can’t be a crack down policy issued overnight. The NFL has to work its way there.
Also, i don’t understand Cushing or McRath at all. If you use PEDs, you are a cheater. End of story. If you aren’t good enough to play without them, then quit playing.
Ain't no time for hesitatin'
All you got to do is groove
by BonzosMontreaux on Aug 12, 2011 8:00 AM CDT reply actions
The way I see it is that this policy it’s just a start.
Brand new drug policies in pro sports always seem to be soft at first. It’s only after the media, public opinion, and/or the government makes a big stink over the flaws in the policy that those things get tougher.
But like I said, it’s a start. The other major sports (to my knowledge) haven’t even got a policy of their own to build on yet. This one by the NFL pushes those other leagues one step closer to adopting one.
Eventually, the policy will get tougher. The toughest part of the whole thing was getting any HGH policy accepted by both sides. If it wasn’t tough to do, there would have been a policy in place a long time ago…
I had to stop arguing with drunks, Steeler fans, and all other fools.
It was making my brick wall jealous...

by 

































