In fact, combine total yards from scrimmage and CJ's lead over Peterson becomes even more...

In fact, combine total yards from scrimmage and CJ's lead over Peterson becomes even more impressive, 2556 for Johnson to Peterson's 1819. We're approaching a thousand yards of offensive difference.

AOL's Clay Travis on why CJ is better than AP.

over 1 year ago Jimmy 8 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Hell yeah!

by hartley on Sep 14, 2010 2:50 PM CDT reply actions

Keith Bulluck

by SouthTexasTitan on Sep 14, 2010 2:50 PM CDT reply actions

Wow, did you see David Whitley's counterpoint?

He has this to say when trying to prove AP is better:

I would definitively prove it through statistics, but you know how stats are more misleading than political attack ads. In this case they say Johnson gained about 700 more yards than Peterson last season.

He then goes on to spend more of the article discussing CJ’s, AP’s, Bud Adams’, Jeff Fisher’s, and Brad Childress’ hair than he does of their respective skills.

Yeah…

by hartley on Sep 14, 2010 2:59 PM CDT reply actions

I noticed that too.

That guy is a total ass clown

by bullrider73 on Sep 14, 2010 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions

Yea the counterargument thing is absolutely terrible writing.

Unless its to show that theres no logical argument for Peterson over CJ, and if so, well done.

Ain't no time for hesitatin'
All you got to do is groove

by BonzosMontreaux on Sep 14, 2010 3:19 PM CDT reply actions

“Size — Peterson is 6-foot-1 and 217 pounds, but disoriented tacklers swear he’s bigger than a Hummer. Johnson is listed at 5-11 and 195, though he’s reportedly closer to 5-3 and 120.”
um, who’s the reporter?

"double rainbow...what does it MEAN?"
The Signing Bonus: We're back in business.

by danielreese05 on Sep 14, 2010 6:47 PM CDT reply actions