Easterbrook's take on run success for Titans
There have been several posts lately regarding how VY contributes to our running game. One argument as to why our running backs might have an easier life with VY is that the defense is having to watch out for the scramble. Easterbrook, who writes the Tuesday Morning Quarterback article weekly for ESPN's page 2 has another angle. Below is an excerpt, but the whole article is fun. Always have enjoyed his column, and the cheerleader pics don't hurt.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=easterbrook/091103&sportCat=nfl
0 recs |
6 comments
Comments
It's another angle
But it’s essentially the same. The zone-read, or read option, always comes from a shotgun spread.
Chuck Klosterman talks about the zone read in his book excerpt:
As I continue to watch Michigan’s quarterback run the read option against the Gophers, I now find myself wondering if this play is authentically simple or quietly complex. The read option is a combination of three rudimentary elements of football: spreading the field, running a back off tackle, and the quarterback keeper. It would be an easy play to teach and a safe play to run, even for junior high kids. But it’s still new. It didn’t really exist in the 1970s and ‘80s, and when I first saw it employed in the late ’90s, it seemed like an idiotic innovation. It seemed like a way to get your quarterback killed without taking advantage of your tailback. I had always believed teams could not succeed by running the ball out of the shotgun formation. I thought it would never happen. But I was wrong. And I suspect the reason I was wrong was not because I didn’t understand what was happening on this specific play; I suspect it was because I felt like I already understood football. I had played football and written about football and watched it exhaustively for twenty years, so I thought I knew certain inalienable truths about the game. And I was wrong. What I knew were the assumed truths, which are not the same thing. I had brainwashed myself. I was unwilling to admit that my traditional, conservative football values were imaginary and symbolic. They belonged to a game I wasn’t actually watching but was still trying to see.
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 3, 2009 9:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
though i cant imagine him ever playing football. but i know he told a story about offseason workouts once, and i couldnt picture it then either.
by mattd97 on Nov 3, 2009 11:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Both are good reads.
I’ve still yet to hear a good reason why the zone-read spread can’t work in the NFL. And, save me the “speed” argument.
As long as CJ is in at running back, I think our offense could run every play out of the shotgun and not miss a beat in the run game. With a QB like Vince who’s more comfortable/mobile in the shotgun, that eliminates the need to be under center.
by SuperHorn on Nov 4, 2009 9:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Because it can't, dummy
Haven’t you heard everybody say so?
by T the D on Nov 4, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think there's a question that the zone-read can work
I remember one time that Hoge was insisting that it couldn’t (he called it a “runaction”) in the NFL, and at the very same time, ESPN was showing a clip of VY using it to go for a 20 yard TD run against the Colts. Silly man.
However, I don’t think it’s a good idea to base an entire offense on it, as you can do in college. In college, hefty price tags aren’t attached to your QB, so while mobile QB’s can be smart about running out of bounds and avoiding hits, you don’t want your QB, whom you pay millions upon millions, to be running around challenging linebackers all the time.
by TheElusiveShadow on Nov 4, 2009 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















