A Closer Look at Lavelle Hawkins, WR, Cal
I sent Danzig, a senior writer at Bearsnecessity, a few questions about the Titans newest receiver, Lavelle Hawkins.
- Who is going to be a better NFL receiver, LaVelle
Hawkins or DeSean Jackson?
Well gee, thanks for the impossible question. How
about which one is hotter: Jessica Alba or Keeley
Hazell? Short answer, Hawk projects as the more
productive NFL WR. Heck, even our coach let it slip
that Hawk would be drafted first (really). Here's
why:
- Hawk is superior physically: This allowed
him to run all the routes on our playbook while Djax
is mainly a deep guy (although Hawk leads in
yards/catch, meaning he can go deep too). We sent
Hawk to catch balls over the middle and take nasty
hits from LBs and Safeties. He owned 3rd downs because
he boxes people out and can catch with defenders
literally on his back (his best quality!). Hawk deals
with press coverage better. He is not affected by the
initial bump, can recover and then has 4.4 speed to
separate.
Hawk can improvise: When our QB is in
trouble he looks for the Hawk. He is especially good
at catching bullets on come-backers when our QB has
been flushed. His ability to catch balls in traffic
also makes him a great red-zone target.
- Hawk does not need open space: Djax is
better in space when making people miss, but isn't
great at fighting off defenders. Although Hawk also
has great moves, he uses his strength or his stiff arm
to fight defenders for YAC. He loves the stiff arm!
Not to say that Hawk can't hot-dog, remember he's been
our KOR guy for 2 years.
- How did Hawkins play against top competition?
Can't really say. In our system we only have two WRs
out 70% of the time. It’s a pure run-first, pro
offense. So Hawk found himself in one-on-ones alot
against the second best corner (Djax gets the best
corners). But regardless the DB talent, he rips them
up consistently. Remember, he led our team in
receiving and all-purpose yards last year, meaning he
produces no matter who it is. As far as big games vs.
small games, Hawk's production never really changes.
He's like a straight line while Djax is like a Sine
wave. Djax is quiet during small games and explodes
during big games. Hawk just keeps getting open game
after game. Remember the Vols game in 07? Everyone
remembers Djax and his big plays, but in that game
Hawk had more receiving yards, yards/catch, total
yards and more return yards...that pretty much sums
him up.
- What NFL receiver do you think Hawkins resembles?
I sort of answered this before in a post but basically
he's a carbon copy of a younger Hines Ward (Steelers).
Like Ward he doesn’t think too much when he’s
catching, meaning his upper-body adjustments are
instinctive and natural (as opposed to being
mechanical) allowing him to catch grossly off-target
balls. Like Ward he doesn't have great timed speed or
size, but functional speed and size (4.44,5’11). Like
Ward he fights off defenders for that extra two or
three yards on each catch and blocks out people with
his body.
0 recs |
6
comments
Read Related
Comments
what i don't understand is...
everything I hear about Hawkins is how good he is. How did he slip to round 4? I’m not complaining….I love the pick…..but how did he make it that far?
by gotitans27 on May 4, 2008 8:49 AM CDT 0 recs
So I had a look over at Bears Necessity...
and saw their recap of the draft and they said:
“He’ll be joined by Lavelle Hawkins. I’ll admit, this move puzzles me. Hawkins can run some awesome routes and is probably more polished for traditional NFL offenses. Why the hell did he end up with Vince Young? It’ll be interesting to see how Tennessee utilizes him, but this smells like third/fourth option for me.”
What does that mean? I can read a lot into that and none of it says he thinks much of the Titans offense. This was written by their Avinash. hmmm…
However, I do like what I’ve been reading about this Hawkins. Him and Johnson will be good additions to the offense.
by Titanfan on May 5, 2008 10:58 AM CDT 0 recs
It was a deep receiver class with no GREAT talent, and he was a #2 receiver.
Plus he had some drops in their game vs. Stanford, and that was on national TV. That-along with the 40-time he ran at the combine-put him back in the Draft. But none of that really means anything, which is why good guys get picked a lot of times in later rounds. He could still be a terrific player, and if he is, don’t be too surprised. It happens.
The only guy who ought to be really upset about this guy’s fall to the fourth is his agent—who gets paid on commission.
DannoE
Go read FRIDAY MAD SCIENCE at www.paperbackreader.com
Go Titans!
by DannoE on
May 6, 2008 5:09 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Hey guys
Avinash from Bears Necessity; I wrote the original post on Hawkins. I’m not sure how well Hawkins will fit into the mobile style of QB play that Vince Young plays. He’s mostly relied on pocket passing and set routes rather than having to adjust on the fly—with Young he’ll have to improvise a lot. But I think he can do well if Tennessee uses him right.
Here’s an example of Hawkins adjusting on the fly late in a game.
by BearsNecessity on
May 6, 2008 5:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Thanks for the video...
He’ll fit in great. The offense is going to look different than last year. I’m sure he’ll be put in good position to be successful.
by Titanfan on
May 7, 2008 11:25 AM CDT
up
0 recs
starting to feel a little better about our 08 draft
i think the main thing is: if our coaches like the players they got (namley, CJ @RB, the Dlinemen, and Hawkins at WR, and if the coaches think they can mold them to make the Titans a better football team this year than last (and in years to come), then all is well.
my point is that this is a very successful, long tenured coaching staff; they should know good and well what they are doing.
only thing that sucks is that it is May; nothing but meaningless baseball for quite some time.
by titanintx on May 8, 2008 2:55 PM CDT 0 recs









